The $upreme Court rules in favor of MGM

Monday, June 27, 2005
Grokster, StreamCast Lose

Posted by Lyle Denniston at 10:31 AM

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that developers of software violate federal copyright law when they provide computer users with the means to share music and movie files downloaded from the Internet, at least when the software companies take "affirmative steps to foster infringement."

In a decision announced by Justice David H. Souter, the Court said: "We hold that one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties" -- that is, computer users using free downloading software.

A sweeping victory for music recording companies and movie studios, the ruling set the stage for a major legal assault on rampant file-sharing of copyrighted works by attacking the software designers -- a much more promising legal avenue than suing infringing users directly.

The decision came in the case of MGM Studios v. Grokster, et al., 04-480.

AngryWoofDog Rants:

The logic that is being applied in this case is so absurd, that mine head will assplode if I think about it too much. Chewbacca!

I can surmise my argument very succinctly here: if file sharing software is responsible for the illegal downloading of music and movies, then web browsing software is repsonsible for the proliferation of child pornography.

'Nuff said, motherfuckers. Get Nraged.

-AngryWoofDog